User Tools

Site Tools


cs501r_f2017:lab7

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
cs501r_f2017:lab7 [2017/10/17 23:03]
wingated
cs501r_f2017:lab7 [2021/06/30 23:42] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
-====WARNING THIS LAB SPEC IS UNDER DEVELOPMENT:​==== 
- 
  
 ====Objective:​==== ====Objective:​====
Line 9: Line 7:
 ---- ----
 ====Deliverable:​==== ====Deliverable:​====
 +
 +{{ :​cs501r_f2017:​faces_samples.png?​direct&​200|}}
  
 For this lab, you will need to implement a generative adversarial For this lab, you will need to implement a generative adversarial
Line 20: Line 20:
 **NOTE:** this lab is complex. ​ Please read through **the entire **NOTE:** this lab is complex. ​ Please read through **the entire
 spec** before diving in. spec** before diving in.
 +
 +Also note that training on this dataset will likely take some time.  Please make sure you start early enough to run the training long enough!
 +
 +{{ :​cs501r_f2017:​faces_interpolate.png?​direct&​200|}}
  
 ---- ----
Line 28: Line 32:
   * 20% Correct implementation of discriminator   * 20% Correct implementation of discriminator
   * 20% Correct implementation of generator   * 20% Correct implementation of generator
-  * 20% Correct implementation of loss functions +  * 50% Correct implementation of training ​algorithm
-  * 20% Correct sharing of variables +
-  * 10% Correct ​training ​of subsets of variables+
   * 10% Tidy and legible final image   * 10% Tidy and legible final image
  
Line 48: Line 50:
  
 ==Part 0: Implement a generator network== ==Part 0: Implement a generator network==
 +
 +One of the advantages of the "​Improved WGAN Training"​ algorithm is that many different kinds of topologies can be used.  For this lab, I recommend one of three options:
 +
 +  * The [[https://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1511.06434.pdf|DCGAN architecture]],​ see Fig. 1.
 +  * A [[https://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1512.03385|ResNet]].
 +  * Our reference implementation used 5 layers:
 +      * A fully connected layer
 +      * 4 convolution transposed layers, followed by a relu and batch norm layers (except for the final layer)
 +      * Followed by a tanh
  
 ==Part 1: Implement a discriminator network== ==Part 1: Implement a discriminator network==
 +
 +Again, you are encouraged to use either a DCGAN-like architecture,​ or a ResNet. ​
 +
 +Our reference implementation used 4 convolution layers, each followed by a leaky relu (leak 0.2) and batch norm layer (except no batch norm on the first layer).
 +
 +Note that the discriminator simply outputs a single scalar value. ​ This value should unconstrained (ie, can be positive or negative), so you should **not** use a relu/​sigmoid on the output of your network.
  
 ==Part 2: Implement the Improved Wasserstein GAN training algorithm== ==Part 2: Implement the Improved Wasserstein GAN training algorithm==
  
-tf.gradients+The implementation of the improved Wasserstein GAN training algorithm (hereafter called "​WGAN-GP"​) is fairly straightforward,​ but involves a few new details about tensorflow:
  
 +  * **Gradient norm penalty.** ​ First of all, you must compute the gradient of the output of the discriminator with respect to x-hat. ​ To do this, you should use the ''​tf.gradients''​ function.
 +  * **Reuse of variables.** ​ Remember that because the discriminator is being called multiple times, you must ensure that you do not create new copies of the variables. ​ Note that ''​scope''​ objects have a ''​reuse_variables()''​ function.
 +  * **Trainable variables.** ​ In the algorithm, two different Adam optimizers are created, one for the generator, and one for the discriminator. ​ You must make sure that each optimizer is only training the proper subset of variables! ​ There are multiple ways to accomplish this.  For example, you could use scopes, or construct the set of trainable variables by examining their names and seeing if they start with "​d_"​ or "​g_":​
 +<code python>
 +t_vars = tf.trainable_variables()
 +self.d_vars = [var for var in t_vars if '​d_'​ in var.name]
 +self.g_vars = [var for var in t_vars if '​g_'​ in var.name]
 +</​code>​
 +
 +I didn't try to optimize the hyperparameters;​ these are the values that I used:
 +
 +<code python>
 +beta1 = 0.5 # 0
 +beta2 = 0.999 # 0.9
 +lambda = 10
 +ncritic = 1 # 5
 +alpha = 0.0002 # 0.0001
 +m = 64
 +
 +batch_norm decay=0.9
 +batch_norm epsilon=1e-5
 +</​code>​
 +
 +Changing to number of critic steps from 5 to 1 didn't seem to matter; changing the alpha parameters to 0.0001 didn't seem to matter; but changing beta1 and beta2 to the values suggested in the paper (0.0 and 0.9, respectively) seemed to make things a lot worse.
 +
 +==Part 3: Generating the final face images==
 +
 +Your final deliverable is two images. ​ The first should be a set of randomly generated faces. ​ This is as simple as generating random ''​z''​ variables, and then running them through your generator.
 +
 +For the second image, you must pick two random ''​z''​ values, then linearly interpolate between them (using about 8-10 steps). ​ Plot the face corresponding to each interpolated ''​z''​ value.
 +
 +See the beginning of this lab spec for examples of both images.
 +
 +----
 +====Hints and implementation notes:====
  
 +The reference implementation was trained for 8 hours on a GTX 1070.  It ran for 25 epochs (ie, scan through all 200,000 images), with batches of size 64 (3125 batches / epoch).
  
 +Although, it might work with far fewer (ie, 2) epochs...
cs501r_f2017/lab7.1508281392.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/06/30 23:40 (external edit)