This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
cs501r_f2017:lab7 [2017/10/27 19:08] wingated |
cs501r_f2017:lab7 [2021/06/30 23:42] (current) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
batch_norm epsilon=1e-5 | batch_norm epsilon=1e-5 | ||
</code> | </code> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Changing to number of critic steps from 5 to 1 didn't seem to matter; changing the alpha parameters to 0.0001 didn't seem to matter; but changing beta1 and beta2 to the values suggested in the paper (0.0 and 0.9, respectively) seemed to make things a lot worse. | ||
==Part 3: Generating the final face images== | ==Part 3: Generating the final face images== | ||
- | Your final deliverable is two images. The first should be a set of randomly generated faces. This is as simple as generating random ''z'' variables, and then running them through your discriminator. | + | Your final deliverable is two images. The first should be a set of randomly generated faces. This is as simple as generating random ''z'' variables, and then running them through your generator. |
For the second image, you must pick two random ''z'' values, then linearly interpolate between them (using about 8-10 steps). Plot the face corresponding to each interpolated ''z'' value. | For the second image, you must pick two random ''z'' values, then linearly interpolate between them (using about 8-10 steps). Plot the face corresponding to each interpolated ''z'' value. | ||
Line 107: | Line 109: | ||
The reference implementation was trained for 8 hours on a GTX 1070. It ran for 25 epochs (ie, scan through all 200,000 images), with batches of size 64 (3125 batches / epoch). | The reference implementation was trained for 8 hours on a GTX 1070. It ran for 25 epochs (ie, scan through all 200,000 images), with batches of size 64 (3125 batches / epoch). | ||
+ | |||
+ | Although, it might work with far fewer (ie, 2) epochs... |